What is the difference between “extending to” and “including” territorial waters in the context of Ukraine’s territory in international law?

Question from lee know, What is the difference between “extending to” and “including” territorial waters in the context of Ukraine’s territory in international law?

Answer from AI:

In international law, the language used to describe a nation’s territory can have significant implications. When discussing the territory of Ukraine, the phrases “extending to its territorial waters” and “including its territorial waters” may seem similar, but they can be interpreted differently.

Extending to Territorial Waters

When the phrase “extending to its territorial waters” is used, it generally refers to the land territory of Ukraine reaching up to the point where its territorial waters begin. This phrase emphasizes the land territory and suggests that the territorial waters are a separate entity.

Including Territorial Waters

On the other hand, when the phrase “including its territorial waters” is used, it implies that the territorial waters are an integral part of Ukraine’s territory. This phrase suggests that the territorial waters are not just an extension, but a part of the country’s sovereign territory.

Implications in International Law

The distinction between these two phrases can have implications in international law, particularly in matters related to jurisdiction, sovereignty, and maritime disputes. According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), a country’s territorial waters extend 12 nautical miles from its baseline, usually the low-water line along the coast. Within these waters, the country has sovereignty, meaning it has the right to exercise jurisdiction over these waters as it does over its land territory.

However, the language used to describe a country’s territory can influence how these rights are interpreted and enforced. For example, if a dispute arises over maritime activities in Ukraine’s territorial waters, the phrase “including its territorial waters” might strengthen Ukraine’s claim to exercise jurisdiction over these waters.

Consulting a Legal Professional

While this explanation provides a general understanding of the potential differences between these phrases, the interpretation of such terms can vary based on context, precedent, and specific legal texts. Therefore, it is recommended to consult with a legal professional specializing in international law for personalized advice.

Remember: The language used in international law can have significant implications. It’s important to understand the potential differences in meaning and interpretation.

For more information on territorial waters and international law, you can refer to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).