Understanding Section 14 of the Government Proceedings Act 1956

Question from saera, Understanding Section 14 of the Government Proceedings Act 1956

Answer from AI:

The Government Proceedings Act 1956 is a piece of legislation in Malaysia that outlines the procedures and circumstances under which the government can be sued and can sue others. Section 14 of this Act deals with specific provisions related to legal proceedings against the government. To address the statements provided:

• (a) The provision provides for a member of the police force.
• (b) The government can be made liable if the injured party is a member of the armed forces.
• (c) If a certificate is issued by the Minister of Finance, the injured party can still sue the government under Section 5 of the Act.
• (d) The government will still be liable even if the Minister of Finance has issued a certificate.

It is important to note that the accuracy of these statements can only be determined by reviewing the actual text of Section 14 of the Government Proceedings Act 1956. The Act itself should be consulted to understand the specific legal provisions and their implications. Legal advice may be necessary to interpret these provisions in the context of a particular case or situation.

Franks Committee’s Recommendations on Tribunals

The Franks Committee was established in the United Kingdom to review the functioning of administrative tribunals. The committee’s recommendations aimed to ensure fairness and independence in the operation of tribunals. Regarding the statements about the Franks Committee’s recommendations:

• (a) Tribunals should remain part of the machinery of the administration.
• (b) Tribunals should convert into courts.
• (c) Tribunals should make decisions and operate independently from the government.
• (d) Tribunals should appoint Judges as Tribunal chairmen.

The true statement among those provided is that tribunals should make decisions and operate independently from the government. This recommendation was made to ensure that tribunals are impartial and not unduly influenced by the government, thereby maintaining the integrity of the administrative justice system.

For those interested in the specifics of the Franks Committee’s recommendations and the subsequent development of administrative tribunals, it is advisable to consult historical documents and legal texts that discuss the committee’s work in detail. Legal professionals can provide personalized advice on how these recommendations have been implemented and interpreted over time.

If you require further information or legal advice, please consult a legal professional or refer to the Government Proceedings Act 1956 for the specific provisions of Section 14. For more on the Franks Committee, you may look into legal history resources that discuss the evolution of administrative law and tribunals in the UK.